Marquise Bailey v. The Boyz Barbershop

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20242:23-cv-10805California922 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-10805-MEMF-AJR 11 MARQUISE BAILEY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS

THE BOYZ BARBERSHOP; RAMIN

15 HALAVI; and DOES 1 to 10,

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20 On December 27, 2023, Plaintiff Marquise Bailey filed a Complaint against Defendants The

21 Boyz Barbershop, Ramin Halavi, and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising 22 out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et 23 seq.; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. 24 Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons 25 Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the Cal. 26 Health & Safety Code § 19955,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.