Jardine Gougis v. South Pasadena Automotive, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20242:23-cv-09401California921 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 O

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-09401-MEMF-JC 11 JARDINE GOUGIS,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS

SOUTH PASADENA AUTOMOTIVE,

15 INC., and DOES 1 to 10,

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20 On November 7, 2023, Plaintiff Jardine Gougis filed a Complaint against Defendants South

21 Pasadena Automotive, Inc. And Does 1 to 10 asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of 22 an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq.; (2) 23 a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code 24 §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. 25 Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.