Sarah Giannella v. Bishoy Hanna

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20242:24-cv-01191California728 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SARAH GIANNELLA, Case No. 2:24-cv-01191-FLA

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

13 v. SARAH GIANNELLA’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION [DKT. 6] AND

14

REMANDING ACTION

BISHOY HANNA,

15

Defendant. 16

17 18 19 RULING 20 On January 12, 2024, Defendant Bishoy Hanna (“Hanna”) filed a Notice of 21 Removal, arguing the court has jurisdiction over three separate actions, all of which 22 Hanna claimed to be related. Giannella v. Hanna, Case No. 2:24-cv-00304-FLA 23 (BFMx), Dkt. 1. Those actions were (1) Sarah Giannella v. Bishoy Hanna, Los 24 Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 23SMRO00410 (the “First Action”); (2) 25 Bishoy Hanna v. Josh Freeman Stinn, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, 26 Case No. 24STCV00037 (the “Second Action”); and (3) Bishoy Hanna v. Sarah 27 Giannella, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 23STFL10014 (the “Third 28 Action”). Id. 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.