Alicia Esquivel v. Conrad Employer LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20242:23-cv-10821California1,008 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-10821-JLS-SSC Date: February 18, 2024 Title: Alicia Esquivel v. Conrad Employer LLC et al

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Gabby Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING TO STATE COURT

The Court ordered Defendant to show cause why this action should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (OSC, Doc. 10.) Both parties responded to the order to show cause. (Def.’s Resp., Doc. 11; Pl.’s Resp., Doc. 12.) Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that Defendant has not met its burden as the removing party to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds CAFA’s $5,000,000 threshold. Therefore, this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. 23STCV27657.

CAFA requires,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.