Orosco

Orosco v. Presidio Market Liquor & Grill, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20242:23-cv-07725California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

United States District Court Central District of California Western Division 11 ALVARO OROSCO, CV 23-07725 TJH

Plaintiff, Order to Show Cause v.

PRESIDIO MARKET LIQUOR &

GRILL, INC., et al., Defendants. 18 The Complaint filed in this case alleged a claim for injunctive relief for an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213 ["ADA"], and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53 ["Unruh Act"]. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim that Plaintiff may have alleged, if any. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Section 1367 "reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, ‘a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.'" City of Chicago v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.