Carly Roddy v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20242:23-cv-09248California4,909 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10

11 CARLY RODDY and SIMON Case No. 2:23-cv-09248 SVW(JCx) RODDY, individuals, [LASC Case No.: 23SMCV04700] 12 Complaint Filed: October 5, 2023 Plaintiff, 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 14 US District Judge: Stephen V. Wilson STATE FARM GENERAL Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian 15 INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation and DOES 1 to 25, [CHANGES MADE BY COURT TO 16 inclusive, PARAGRAPHS 5, 10(c), 11(c)]

17 Defendants.

18

Having reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order agreed upon 19 between Plaintiffs Carly and Simon Roddy (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant State Farm 20 General Insurance Company (“State Farm”) (collectively referred to herein as 21 “Parties”) and good cause appearing, the Court hereby accepts and GRANTS the 22 Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order as agreed upon between the Parties and as 23 set forth below: 24 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.