Joseph Scott Alter v. Mitch McConnell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20242:23-cv-05785California2,392 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH SCOTT ALTER, Case No. 2:23-cv-05785-ODW-PD

12 Plaintiff,

FINAL REPORT AND

13 v.

RECOMMENDATION OF

14 MITCH MCCONNELL, UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Defendant. 16

17 This Final Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable 18 Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 19 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central 20 District of California.1 21 22

23 1 This Final Report and Recommendation (“Final Report”) addresses an argument in the Second Amended Objections filed by Plaintiff to the section in the Initial Report 24 and Recommendation (“Initial Report”) regarding venue. [Dkt. Nos. 29, 32 at 1-2.] 25 Because Defendant is an officer or employee of the United States, the First Amended Complaint may be brought in this district since no real property is involved. See 28 26 U.S.C. § 1391(e)(1)(C). The Court therefore withdraws Section V. C of the Initial Report, which erroneously concluded that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.