Theresa Brooke v. Nars Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20242:24-cv-00355California965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 Case No.: 2:24-cv-00355-MEMF-E THERESA BROOKE, a married woman

dealing with her sole and separate claim, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL v. JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

NARS INC., a California corporation,

Defendant.

On January 13, 2024, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke, a married woman dealing with her sole and

separate claim, filed a Complaint against Defendant Nars inc., a California corporation, asserting: (1)

a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act

(“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182–12188; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil

Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 52, et seq.; ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.