Theresa Brooke v. Nars Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20242:24-cv-00355California965 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 Case No.: 2:24-cv-00355-MEMF-E 8 THERESA BROOKE, a married woman

dealing with her sole and separate claim, 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO 10 EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL v. JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S 11 STATE LAW CLAIMS

12 NARS INC., a California corporation,

13 Defendant.

14

15

16

17 On January 13, 2024, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke, a married woman dealing with her sole and

18 separate claim, filed a Complaint against Defendant Nars inc., a California corporation, asserting: (1)

19 a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act

20 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182–12188; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil

21 Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 52, et seq.; ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges that this 22 Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.