Estate of Jackeline Chavez v. Flixbus, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20242:24-cv-01372California500 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-01372-JLS-RAO Date: February 28, 2024 Title: Estate of Jackeline Chavez v. Flixbus, Inc., et al.

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Charles A. Rojas N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT

Plaintiff Elba Parra, on behalf of the Estate of Jackeline Chavez, initiated this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on August 24, 2023, asserting claims for negligence. (See Ex. A to Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Compl., Doc. 1.) Defendant Flixbus, Inc. was served with the summons and complaint on January 22, 2024, and removed the action to federal court on February 20, 2024, invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. (See NOR ¶ 2, 10, Doc. 1.)

“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.