Roger D. Silk v. Baron Bond
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
JS-6
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
10
11 ROGER D. SILK, Case № 2:21-cv-03977-ODW (JPRx)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
13 v.
TRANSFER [53]
14 BARON BOND et al.,
15 Defendants.
16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Defendants Baron Bond and Howard Miller move to transfer this action to the 19 United States District Court for the District of Maryland, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1404(a). (Mot. Transfer (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 53.) Defendants argue that 21 a transfer is necessary for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and in the 22 interest of justice. (Id.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS 23 Defendants’ Motion to Transfer. (ECF No. 53.)1 24 II. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff Roger Silk provided tax, estate, and related planning services to 26 decedent Frank Bond (“Decedent”) under three different agreements. (Compl. ¶¶ 20, 27
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the…