Karla Silva Huerta v. Doubletree Employer LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20248:23-cv-02433California2,620 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

24

25 Plaintiff Karla Silva Huerta, on behalf of the people of the State of California and 26 as an aggrieved employee acting as a private attorney general under California’s Labor 27 Code Private Attorney General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”), brings this action against 1 Defendants Doubletree Employer LLC, Curio Employer LLC, and unnamed Does 2 seeking to recover PAGA penalties for herself and on behalf of all current and former 3 aggrieved employees that worked for Defendants. (See Dkt. 1-2 [Compl.].) Plaintiff 4 originally brought this action in Orange County Superior Court, but Defendants 5 subsequently removed the action, invoking the Court’s federal question jurisdiction. (See 6 Dkt. 1 [Notice of Removal, hereinafter “Notice”].) Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s 7 motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Dkt. 20 [Memorandum of 8 Points and Authorities in Support, hereinafter “Mot.”].) For the following reasons, 9 Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.1 10 11 II. BACKGROUND 12 13 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants employed her at a California location from June of 14 2022 to April 10, 2023. (Compl. ¶ 7.) According to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.