David D'Amico v. Olive Garden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20248:23-cv-02440California585 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Background

When Plaintiff David D’Amico was walking around an Olive Garden restaurant, he was “struck by a hanging and/or loose extension cord. which allegedly caused Plaintiff to endure severe injury and pain. Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (Dkt. 24) at 4.

Plaintiff sued for negligence, willful failure to warn, and for maintaining a dangerous condition on their property in Orange County Superior Court. Id. at 7; Notice of Removal (“Not.”) (Dkt. 1) at 7. The Complaint names four defendants: Olive Garden, Newkoa LLC, Darden Concepts, and Piluntana Maneerod. Maneerod and Newkoa are both citizens of California. Plaintiff, too, is a citizen of California.

Defendant removed this lawsuit to federal court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. The Court disagrees.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:23-CV-02440-DOC-JDEx Date: February 29, 2024

Page 2

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case from state court to federal court is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides in relevant part that “any civil action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.