Reza Senobarian v. Antony J. Blinken
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
10
11 REZA SENOBARIAN et al., Case № 2:23-cv-07208-ODW (MAAx)
12 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING
13 v.
DEFENDANTS’
14 ANTONY J. BLINKEN et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [10]
15 Defendants.
16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiffs Reza Senobarian and Rezwan Senobarian bring this immigration 19 action against Antony J. Blinken, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; Merrick 20 Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General; and Dr. Amy Gutmann, in her 21 official capacity as U.S. Ambassador to Germany, for declaratory relief and a writ of 22 mandamus requiring that Defendants adjudicate Plaintiffs’ Form DS160 application 23 for a B1/B2 nonimmigrant visa. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Defendants now move to 24 dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 25 (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 10.) 26 For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.1 27
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers…