Theresa Brooke v. The Zislis Group Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20242:24-cv-00358California991 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 Case No.: 2:24-cv-00358-MEMF-PD 10 THERESA BROOKE, a married woman

dealing with her sole and separate claim, 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO 12 EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL v. JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S 13 STATE LAW CLAIMS

14 THE ZISLIS GROUP INC., a California

15 corporation,

Defendant. 16

17

18

19 On January 13, 2024, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke, a married woman dealing with her sole and

20 separate claim, filed a Complaint against Defendant The Zislis Group Inc., a California corporation,

21 asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with 22 Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182–121881; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to 23 California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 52, et seq. ECF No. 1. The 24 Complaint alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the ADA claim pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.