Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television v. Henok Tekle Gebrekidan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ? CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 ERISAT-ERITREAN SATELLITE Case No. CV 24-1121-DMG (AJRx) |PPEEVISION, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiff, V. |ERISATFORJUSTICE, Defendants. 18 19 This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television’s (“EEST’’) Motion for Preliminary Injunction. [Doc. #2 (“MPI’”).] Neither Defendant Henok Tekle Gebrekidan nor Erisat for Justice entered an appearance in the case, nor did they file any Opposition to the MPI. The Court has duly considered EEST’s briefs, evidence, and argument, and has granted the MPI. The Court has found that issuance of a preliminary injunction is warranted. EEST 25 || has demonstrated that the law and facts clearly favor its position on its conversion claim 26 || and it is likely to suffer irreparable injury in the absence of a preliminary injunction. 27 || See Order re MPI at 4—5 (citing Winter v. Nat.…