Miltita Casillas v. Hanesbrands Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20242:24-cv-01641California675 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-01641-RGK-JC Date March 4, 2024 Title Miltita Casillas v. Hanesbrands Inc.

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joseph Remigio (not present) Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attomeys Present for Defendant: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Amount in Controversy [DE 1]

On January 18, 2024, Miltita Casillas (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against Hanesbrands Inc. (“Defendant”) in Los Angeles County Superior Court alleging a single claim for violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) under California Penal Code section 638.51. On February 28, 2024, Defendant timely removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, a district court shall have original jurisdiction over any civil action where the matter in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.