Francois Tabi v. Deputy Stephenson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20242:21-cv-09929California1,598 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ) 11 FRANCOIS TABI, ) Case No. CV 21-9929-DMG (JC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND 13 v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED DEPUTY STEPHENSON, et al., ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the verified Civil Rights 19 Complaint, all documents submitted by Plaintiff and Defendant Los Angeles County 20 Sheriff’s Deputy Michael Stephenson (“Stephenson”) in connection with Defendant 21 Stephenson’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”), 22 the September 20, 2023 Amended/Superseding Report and Recommendation of United 23 States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), Plaintiff’s “Opposition” to such 24 Report and Recommendation and supporting Declaration (collectively, “Objections”), and 25 all of the other records herein. The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.