Andrew Kramer v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20242:24-cv-01745California1,786 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

DISCUSSION

Because the Petition was filed after April 24, 1996, the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), the Petition is subject to the AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations, as set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). See Campbell v. Henry, 614 F.3d 1056, 1058 (9th Cir. 2010). 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) provides: “(1) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. The limitation period shall run from the latest of– (A) the date on which the judgment became final by conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review; (B) the date on which the impediment to filing an application created by State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the applicant was prevented from filing by such State action; (C) the date on which the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or (D) the date on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.