Jardine Gougis v. Fair Oaks Car Wash LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20242:24-cv-01896California790 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARDINE GOUGIS, No. 2:24-cv-01896-JAK (RAOx) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 12 SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION v. OVER STATE-LAW CLAIMS 13

FAIR OAKS CAR WASH LLC;

14 IZABELLA KEOSYAN; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are 2 made: 3 The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 4 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), 5 Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other provisions of California law. Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 18-51. 6 Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the state-law claims. Dkt. 1 ¶ 7. 7 District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that 8 are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part 9 of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 10…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.