Pamela Sullivan v. Walmart, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-01111-MCS-E Date March 13, 2024 Title Sullivan v. Walmart, Inc.
Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge
Stephen Montes Kerr Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 18)
Plaintiffs Pamela Sullivan, Javal Ashley, and Hilario Garcia move to remand this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (Mot., ECF No. 18.) They argue that jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) no longer exists because they amended their complaint to delete class allegations. (Mot. 3; compare FAC, ECF No. 11, with Compl, ECF No. 1.)! The Court deems the motion appropriate for decision without further briefing or oral argument and vacates the hearing set for April 22, 2024. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Federal courts are of limited jurisdiction,…