State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Maria T. Lazo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20242:23-cv-10242California339 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-10242-SPG-JDE Date March 13, 2024

Title State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Maria T. Lazo et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before March 27, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.