Joseph Piros v. Appfolio Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20248:24-cv-00278California369 words
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:24-cv-00278-KES Date: March 13, 2024
Titles: Joseph Piros v. Appfolio Inc., et al.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”)
WHY APPLICATION OF NON-
RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR
PRO HAC VICE SHOULD NOT BE
DENIED UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-
2.1.3.2(c).
This Court orders Plaintiff Joseph Piros (“Piros”) to show cause why Hans. W. Lodge’s Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice should not be denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). On March 8, 2024, this attorney applied for permission to appear pro hac vice. (Dkt. 14.) Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c) states: Unless authorized by the Constitution of the United States or Acts of Congress, an applicant is not eligible for permission to practice pro hac vice if the applicant … is regularly engaged in business,…