Joseph Piros v. Appfolio Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20248:24-cv-00278California369 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-00278-KES Date: March 13, 2024

Titles: Joseph Piros v. Appfolio Inc., et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”)

WHY APPLICATION OF NON-

RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR

PRO HAC VICE SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-

2.1.3.2(c).

This Court orders Plaintiff Joseph Piros (“Piros”) to show cause why Hans. W. Lodge’s Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice should not be denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). On March 8, 2024, this attorney applied for permission to appear pro hac vice. (Dkt. 14.) Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c) states: Unless authorized by the Constitution of the United States or Acts of Congress, an applicant is not eligible for permission to practice pro hac vice if the applicant … is regularly engaged in business,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.