Joel Zalvin v. Michael Carrel

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20248:24-cv-00482California2,990 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 8:24-cv-00482-FWS-JDE Date: March 14, 2024 Title: Joel Zalvin v. Michael Carrel et al. Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa H. Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION [9]

Before the court is Plaintiff Joel Zalvin’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte Application (“Application” or “App.”). (Dkt. 9.) Defendant Axonics, Inc. (“Defendant Axonics”) opposed the Application (“Opposition” or “Opp.”).1 (Dkt. 10.) The court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b) (“By rule or order, the court may provide for submitting and determining motions on briefs, without oral hearings.”); L.R. 7- 15 (authorizing courts to “dispense with oral argument on any motion except where an oral hearing is required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.