Shawn Edward Shaffer v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20242:22-cv-02451California1,480 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN EDWARD SHAFFER, Case No. 2:22-cv-02451-SPG (MRW)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records 19 on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States 20 Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 21 portions of the Report to which objections have been made. 22 The Report recommends the denial of habeas relief for Petitioner’s claims 23 challenging his convictions for sex offenses against children. (ECF No. 23.) For 24 the following reasons, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (ECF No. 26) do not 25 warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. 26 Petitioner objects that the evidence was insufficient, under Jackson v. 27 Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), to sustain some of his convictions.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.