BirdDog Technology Limited v. 2082 Technology, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court are defendants Lo and 2082’s motion to dismiss and defendant Lee’s motion to dismiss, along with defendants’ requests for judicial notice. On November 7, 2023, plaintiffs BirdDog Technology Limited and BirdDog Australia Pty., Ltd. (collectively, “BirdDog’”) filed suit against defendants 2082 Technology, LLC dba Bolin Technology (“2082”), Mr. Hoi “Kyle” Lo, and Does 1-25. Dkt. 1. On December 15, 2023, plaintiffs filed two applications for writs of attachment, one against defendant Lo and one against defendant 2082, which Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg denied on February 13, 2024. Dkts. 24, 25, 60. On December 22, 2023, defendants Lo and 2082 filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. 27. On January 12, 2024, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (the “FAC”), which mooted defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dkts. 34, 43. The FAC adds defendants Bolin Technology Co., Ltd. (“Bolin Limited” or “Bolin China,” and collectively with defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL ‘0’
Case No. 2:23-cv-09416-CAS (AGRx) Date March 11, 2024 Title …