Clinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:22-cv-09203California3,319 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:22-09203-MEMF-KS 11 CLINTON BROWN,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTAINING ORDER [ECF

13 v. No. 138] 14 15 CLARK R. TAYLOR, AICP, THE LOS

ANGELES COUNT DEPARTMENT OF

16 REGIONA PLANNING, 17 Defendant.

18 19 20 Before the Court is an Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order filed by 21 Plaintiff Clinton Brown. For the reasons stated herein, the Application is DENIED. 22 I. Factual and Procedural History 23 The factual background of this action is described in greater detail in the Court’s previous 24 Order Denying Preliminary Injunction. See ECF No. 105 (“PI Order”). To briefly restate facts1 25 relevant to this Order, Plaintiff Clinton Brown (“Brown”) is an individual who sought to develop a 26

27 1 Except where otherwise indicated, these facts are derived from the allegations in the Complaint (ECF No. 1, “Compl.”), and from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.