Moises Villalobos v. Tigranakert Meat Market Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20242:24-cv-01611California920 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-01611-MEMF-MAR 11 MOISES VILLALOBOS,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS

TIGRANAKERT MEAT MARKET INC.;

15 V.M.A PROPERTIES, LLC; and DOES 1

16 through 10,

Defendants. 17

18

19

20 On February 27, 2024, Plaintiff Moises Villalobos filed a Complaint against Defendants

21 Tigranakert Meat Market Inc.; V.M.A Properties, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, asserting: (1) a 22 claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act 23 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq.; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil 24 Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the 25 California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive 26 relief pursuant to the Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.