Siranoush Shakerian v. Marshalls of CA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20242:24-cv-01526California526 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:24-cv-01526-AB-PD Date: March 18, 2024

Title: Siranoush Shakerian et al v. Marshalls of CA, LLC et al

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION

Defendant removed this action on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. “The ‘strong presumption’ against removal jurisdiction means that the defendant always has the burden of establishing that removal is proper.” Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992). “Because of the Congressional purpose to restrict the jurisdiction of the federal courts on removal,” statutes conferring jurisdiction are “strictly construed and federal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.