Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON, Case No. 5:23-cv-02542-SSS-AJR

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

JAMES B. HICKS, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends dismissal of the First Amended Complaint without further leave to amend and dismissal of the action with prejudice. [Dkt. 15]. Specifically, the Report finds that the First Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and that further amendment would be futile. [Id.] As stated below, Plaintiff’s objections to the Report, [Dkt. 18], do not warrant a change to the Magistrate…