Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States of America

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON, Case No. 5:23-cv-02542-SSS-AJR

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

14 JAMES B. HICKS, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, 18 all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States 19 Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation. 20 The Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends dismissal of the First 21 Amended Complaint without further leave to amend and dismissal of the action with 22 prejudice. [Dkt. 15]. Specifically, the Report finds that the First Amended Complaint 23 fails to state a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and that 24 further amendment would be futile. [Id.] As stated below, Plaintiff’s objections to the 25 Report, [Dkt. 18], do not warrant a change to the Magistrate…