Maurice Hastings v. Grant Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20242:23-cv-09684California504 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 Maurice Hastings, Case № 2:23-cv-09684-ODW (AGRx)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

13 v.

SET ASIDE DEFAULT [37]

14 Grant Price et al.,

15 Defendants.

16 17 18 Presently before the Court is Defendants Grant Price and Russell Enyeart’s 19 (“Defendants”) Motion to Set Aside the Clerk’s Entry of Default. (Mot. Set Aside 20 (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 37.) After carefully considering the papers filed in 21 connection with the Motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision 22 without oral argument and vacates the April 8, 2024 hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); 23 C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 24 Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file 25 an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated 26 for hearing the motion. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that “[t]he failure to 27 file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed 28 consent to the granting or denial of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.