8112 Magnolia, LLC v. Eric A. Henrichsen

JS-6

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 8112 Magnolia, LLC CASE NUMBER: 5 6 5:24-cv-00572-KK-DTB Plaintiff(s), 7 v. 8 || Eric A. Henrichsen et al.

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

9 STATE COURT 10 Defendant(s). 11 12 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 13 || County of Riverside for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 14 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 15 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 16 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 17 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 18 || removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 19 || Am. Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2012); Gaus v.…