Daniel Ray Loyd v. Kathleen Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 5:21-cv-01817-SPG-SHK DANIEL RAY LOYD,

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,

Defendants.

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“R. & R.”), Plaintiff’s objections to the R. & R., and Defendants’ opposition to 22 Plaintiff’s objections. Further, the Court has made a de novo determination of the 23 portions of the R. & R. to which objections have been made. 24 The R. & R. recommends dismissal of this action without prejudice because 25 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, failed to exhaust available administrative remedies before 26 bringing this suit. (ECF No. 57 (“R. & R.”)). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s 27 28 objections to the R. & R., (ECF No. 64), do not warrant a change to the R. & R.’s…