Arturo Favela-Gomez v. B. Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20242:23-cv-01773California525 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} ARTURO FAVELA-GOMEZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-01773-MEMEF (KES) Me Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ny SMEATON orga 14 | B. BIRKHOLZ, Warden, ts Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the 19 || records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United 20 || States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. No. 22.) Further, the Court has engaged in a de 21 || novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. 22 The Report found that Petitioner is ineligible for earned time credits 23 |} (“ETCs”) under the First Step Act because he was convicted of conspiracy to 24 || distribute and distribution of methamphetamine with an enhancement for his role as 25 || an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the offense. (Dkt. No. 22 26 || at 8.) Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 24) do not warrant any 27 || change to the Magistrate Judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.