Michael McMann v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20242:23-cv-10488California540 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL MCMANN, ) No. CV 23-10488 FMO (RAOx) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 14, 2023. (See Dkt. 1). By Order dated March 18 5, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, on or before March 12, 2024, why this action should 19 not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to complete service of the summons and complaint as 20 required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 10, Court’s Order of 21 March 5, 2024). Plaintiff was admonished that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to th[e] Order to 22 Show Cause shall result in the action . . . being dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure 23 to comply with the orders of the court.” (Id.). As of the date of this Order, plaintiff has not 24 responded to the Order to Show Cause nor filed proofs of service of the summons and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.