Joshua Blocker v. Joel Solis
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 JOSHUA BLOCKER, Case No. CV 20-11764-MWF (AGR)
12 Plaintiff
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
13 v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
14 JOEL SOLIS, et al., JUDGE 15 Defendants.
16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the 18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Motion”), the Report and Recommendation 19 of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Motion (“Report,” 20 Docket No. 59), Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (“Objections,” Docket No. 62), 21 Defendants’ Response to the Objections (“Response,” Docket No. 63), and other 22 relevant records on file. 23 Preliminarily, the Court notes that although styled as “Objections,” Plaintiff 24 appears to oppose Defendants’ Motion rather than object to the Report. (See, e.g., 25 Docket No. 62 at 1-3 (stating that “Defendants contend[]” and “Defendants also 26 contend,” and then responding to each contention). However, as noted in…