Joshua Blocker v. Joel Solis

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20242:20-cv-11764California879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA BLOCKER, Case No. CV 20-11764-MWF (AGR)

Plaintiff

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JOEL SOLIS, et al., JUDGE Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Motion”), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Motion (“Report,” Docket No. 59), Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (“Objections,” Docket No. 62), Defendants’ Response to the Objections (“Response,” Docket No. 63), and other relevant records on file. Preliminarily, the Court notes that although styled as “Objections,” Plaintiff appears to oppose Defendants’ Motion rather than object to the Report. (See, e.g., Docket No. 62 at 1-3 (stating that “Defendants contend[]” and “Defendants also contend,” and then responding to each contention). However, as noted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.