Miltita Casillas v. Hanesbrands Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20242:24-cv-01641California671 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS6

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-01641-RGK-JC Date March 22, 2024 Title Miltita Casillas v. Hanesbrands Inc.

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joseph Remigio Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Remanding Action to State Court

On January 18, 2024, Miltita Casillas (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Hanesbrands Inc. (“Defendant”) in Los Angeles County Superior Court alleging a single violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) under California Penal Code section 638.51. Defendant removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Upon reviewing Defendant’s notice of removal, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to whether the amount in controversy requirement was met. (ECF No. 11.) Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.