Azhar Lal v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 18-02056-SPG (DFM) 11 AZHAR LAL,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

13 v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

15 CORRECTIONS AND

16 REHABILITATION et al.,

17 Defendants. 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records 20 and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States 21 Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of 22 the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts 23 the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. 24 In Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 125 (“Reconsideration”)), which 25 the Court construes as an objection to the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff raises two 26 objections. First, Plaintiff argues that the Court failed to appoint counsel as…