Lajuana Danette White v. Fesia Davenport

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20248:23-cv-02300California7,746 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 6, 2023, Plaintiff Lajuana Danette White (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint alleging violations of her civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On January 10, 2024, the District Judge granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 3, 5.) The Court has screened the Complaint and, for the reasons stated below, dismisses it with leave to amend. Plaintiff must file a response to this Order, as set forth in Part V infra, no later than April 25, 2024.

II. ALLEGATIONS AND CLAIMS1

The Complaint is filed against: (1) Fesia Davenport, C.E.O.; (2) Lisa Garrett, Director of Personnel; (3) Mona Patuano, Assistant Nursing Director; (4) Renee Bernardo, Nurse Manager; (5) Grace Meza, Staff Assistant II; (6) Diane Sanchez, Clinical Nursing Director I; (7) Michelle Ner, Nurse Manager; (8) Craig Vincent-Jones, Executive Director; (9) Inell Kyles, Nursing Manager; and (10) County of Los Angeles (“County”) (each, a “Defendant” and collectively, “Defendants”). (Compl. ¶¶ 1–10.)2 Defendants Davenport, Garrett, Patuano, Bernardo, Meza, Sanchez, Ner,

1 The Court summarizes the allegations and claims in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.