James Toledano v. Priscilla Marconi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20248:22-cv-01331California718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TOLEDANO, Case No. SACV 22-1331-MWF (BFM)

Plaintiff

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

PRISCILLA MARCONI, et al., JUDGE Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“Motions,” Docket Nos. 59, 62), Plaintiff’s Oppositions to the Motions (Docket Nos. 64, 65), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Motions in part (“Report,” Docket No. 73), the Objections of the Parties (Docket Nos. 75, 76), the Replies/Responses to the Objections filed by the parties (Docket Nos, 77-79), and other relevant records on file. Although not required, the Court briefly makes the following observations. See United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2023) (“the district court ha[s] no obligation to provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.