James Toledano v. Priscilla Marconi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20248:22-cv-01331California718 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JAMES TOLEDANO, Case No. SACV 22-1331-MWF (BFM)

12 Plaintiff

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

13 v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

14 PRISCILLA MARCONI, et al., JUDGE 15 Defendants.

16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended 18 Complaint, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 19 (“Motions,” Docket Nos. 59, 62), Plaintiff’s Oppositions to the Motions (Docket 20 Nos. 64, 65), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 21 recommending granting the Motions in part (“Report,” Docket No. 73), the 22 Objections of the Parties (Docket Nos. 75, 76), the Replies/Responses to the 23 Objections filed by the parties (Docket Nos, 77-79), and other relevant records on 24 file. 25 Although not required, the Court briefly makes the following observations. 26 See United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2023) (“the district court 27 ha[s] no obligation to provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.