Rocha

Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20242:24-cv-02295California2,003 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

BACKGROUND

On March 20, 2024, Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (Dkt. No. 1.) The Petition appears to state that Petitioner is challenging an “error of P.L.R.A. fees.” (Id. at 2.)1

Petitioner has filed several prior habeas petitions in this district, including the following:

1) Alonzo McKinney v. Newsom, 2:23-cv-01529-AB-AGR (February 17, 2023) (dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim); 2) Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown, 2:22-cv-02722-JGB-KS (April 22, 2022) (dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim); 3) Alonzo McKinney v. G. Newsom, 2:20-cv-10736-JGB-KS (Jan. 15, 2021) (dismissed as second or successive); 4) Alonzo McKinney v. G. Newson, 2:19-cv-04059-JGB-KS (Jun. 14, 2019) (dismissed as second or successive); 5) Alonzo McKinney v. Scott Kernan, 2:18-cv-04088-JAK-FFM (Jul. 2, 2018) (dismissed as second or successive); 6) Alonzo McKinney v. G. Smith, 2:17-cv-02578-JAK-FFM (Dec. 1, 2017) (dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim);

1 For ease of reference, the Court cites to the page numbers assigned by the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.