Anthony Edwards v. Jim Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20245:23-cv-00126California1,399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY EDWARDS, Case No. 5:23-cv-00126-MEMF (KES) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JIM ROBERTSON, Warden, 14 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Magistrate Judge’s Report recommends dismissal with prejudice of Ground Four of the Petition, service of the Petition to Respondent, and a stay of the action until the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issues its decision in Price v. Santoro, No. 23-55324. (ECF No. 13.) For the following reasons, Petitioner’s objections to the Report (ECF Nos. 20,21, 23)warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation. /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.