Anton Toutov v. Curative Labs Inc.

O 1

JS-6

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 ANTON TOUTOV, Case № 2:20-cv-11284-ODW (ASx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING

13 v. MOTION TO VACATE JURY

VERDICT [257] AND DENYING

14 CURATIVE LABS INC. et al., EX PARTE APPLICATION TO

15 Defendants. INTERVENE [258]

16 17 I.INTRODUCTION 18 Defendants Jonathan Martin and Paul Scott move to vacate the jury verdict in 19 light of their post-verdict, pre-judgment settlement with Plaintiff Anton Toutov. (Mot. 20 Vacate (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 257.) Former Defendant Curative Inc., now 21 dismissed, applies ex parte to intervene in this action for the limited purpose of opposing 22 the Motion. (Ex Parte Appl. Intervene (“Appl.”), ECF No. 258.) Having considered 23 the Motion, Ex Parte Application, and Martin and Scott’s Opposition to the Ex Parte 24 Application, (Opp’n Appl., ECF No. 263), the Court finds that oral argument would not 25 be helpful in this matter and VACATES the April 1, 2024 hearing, Fed. R. Civ.…