Lopez

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JOHN F. DEONARINE, Case No. 2:22-03353 JLS (ADS)

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

14 LOPEZ, et al., RECOMMENDATION

15 Defendants.

16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendants’ Motion for 18 Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 52), Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for 19 Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 55), Plaintiff’s related filings (Dkt. Nos. 56-58), 20 Defendants’ Reply (Dkt. No. 60), the Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 66), and Plaintiff’s Objection with Points and Authorities to 22 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 68). 23 The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and 24 Recommendation to which objections were made and overrules the objections. 1 || Specifically, with regards to the objection asserting that reasonable cause and probable 2 || cause…