Luis Miguel Muniz v. Bryan D. Phillips

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20242:23-cv-05421California2,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-05421-SPG-BFM LUIS MIGUEL MUNIZ,

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BRYAN D. PHILLIPS,

Respondent.

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Petitioner Luis Miguel Muniz’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, (ECF No. 1 (“Petition”)), the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, (ECF No. 22 (“Report”)), and Petitioner’s Opposition to the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. (“Objections”)). The Court has made de novo determinations as to the portions of the Report to which Petitioner objects. The Report recommends denial of the Petition because the claims are untimely or otherwise not cognizable as federal habeas claims. (R. & R. at 5). For the following reasons, Petitioner’s Objections do not warrant a change to the Report’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.