Pierre Lakell Morris v. D. Holbrook

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20242:20-cv-03344California522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PIERRE LAKELL MORRIS, Case No. 2:20-cv-03344-FLA (AGR) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

D. HOLBROOK, et al., JUDGE 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed Pierre Lakell Morris’ (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) (Dkt. 1), the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Dkt. 28 (“Report”)). Further, the court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action with prejudice. Report at 46. Petitioner’s objections to the Report (Dkt. 33) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects, as to Claim Three, that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.