Pierre Lakell Morris v. D. Holbrook

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PIERRE LAKELL MORRIS, Case No. 2:20-cv-03344-FLA (AGR) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS 13 v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

14 D. HOLBROOK, et al., JUDGE 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed Pierre Lakell Morris’ 2 (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) (Dkt. 1), the records 3 on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 4 (“Report”) (Dkt. 28 (“Report”)). Further, the court has engaged in a de novo review 5 of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. 6 The Report recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action 7 with prejudice. Report at 46. Petitioner’s objections to the Report (Dkt. 33) do not 8 warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. 9 Petitioner objects, as to Claim Three, that the evidence was insufficient to 10 support his convictions for…