Sanjiv Goel, M.D., Inc. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20242:23-cv-10071California4,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:23-cv-10071-HDV (SSCx) SANJIV GOEL, M.D., INC.,

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. NO. 11]

AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS [DKT. NO. 14]

UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. Defendant 17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a Motion to Remand1 filed by Plaintiff Sanjiv Goel, M.D., Inc. on December 29, 2023, as well as a Motion to Dismiss2 filed by Defendant United Healthcare Services filed on January 5, 2024.3 In the Motion to Remand, Plaintiff argues that the case does not satisfy diversity jurisdiction because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000 and the claims do not present a federal question. See Motion to Remand at 1–2. In the Motion to Dismiss, United Healthcare contends that Plaintiff has not adequately pled its seven causes of action because the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.