Lopez

1

JS-

3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GILBERT A. TORRES, Case No. 2:23-cv-07141-FWS-AGR 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

v.

D. AVALOS, et al.,

15 Defendants.

I.

BACKGROUND

21 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 22 document entitled “Injunction Relief Motion.” (Dkt. No. 1.) The court denied the 23 request for injunctive relief. (Dkt. No. 4.) Subsequently, Plaintiff filed a series of three documents: a “motion to file” 26 (Dkt. No. 8), a “memo: relief order (Dkt. No. 9), and a “memo” (Dkt. No. 10). 27 28 The court has screened the four documents (Dkt. Nos. 1, 8, 9, 10) to 2 determine whether the action is frivolous or fails to state a claim on which relief 3 may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court’s screening is governed 4 by the following standards: To survive dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, 7 accepted as true, to ‘state a claim…