Ryan Edward Rude v. Hunter Anglea

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20245:19-cv-00403California914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN EDWARD RUDE, Case No. 5:19-cv-00403-JWH (AGR) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

HUNTER ANGLEA, Warden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondent.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Amended Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends denial of the First Amended Petition and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 59.) As explained below, Petitioner’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 61) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner requests the appointment of counsel and an investigator. (ECF No. 61 at 1.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.