Omar Ageel v. R.C. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20242:20-cv-10093California511 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMAR AGEEL, ) No. CV 20-10093-JWH (AGR) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS 13 v. ) ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE 14 R.C. JOHNSON, Warden, et al., ) TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 18 19 For the reasons discussed below, the court orders Plaintiff to show cause in 20 writing, on or before May 6, 2024, why this Court should not recommend dismissal 21 without prejudice of this action for failure to file a First Amended Complaint. The filing of 22 a First Amended Complaint on or before May 6, 2024, shall be sufficient to discharge 23 this order to show cause. 24 The District Court issued an Order Accepting the Findings and Recommendation in the 25 Report and Recommendation (“Report”) issued on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 26 (Dkt. No. 35.) The Report recommended that the District Court grant Defendants’ motion for 27 summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.