Warden

Juan Correa-Gutierrez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20242:23-cv-08911California318 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 O

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JUAN CORREA-GUTIERREZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-08911-CBM-KES

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

13 v.

RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.

14 WARDEN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Respondent.

16

17

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the

19 other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S.

20 Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 5). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were 21 filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the 22 report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the 24 Petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 25 As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is not 26 required to obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to appeal to the 27 United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.